Childhood trauma accelerates biological aging and raises the risk of chronic pain ✎ medRxiv

Original: "Childhood trauma, accelerated biological aging and chronic pain across two population cohorts"
b42w:2609.90015 · the paper's page · 2026-09-09 · All rights reserved · independent analysis · 2 min
A tough childhood leaves marks on DNA methylation that, in women, are linked to faster aging and chronic pain.

In the newsreel of childhood, each of us has frames we'd like to rewind. But the film doesn't tear; it just gets scratched. Scientists from Scotland and the United States looked into those scratches at the molecular level and saw that a hard childhood leaves not only memories but also chemical marks on DNA that make cells age faster.

In two large groups of people, about a thousand in each, the researchers collected answers to questions about childhood adversity: abuse, neglect, an unstable family. Then they took blood from each participant and measured DNA methylation. These are chemical "clasps" that can switch genes on or off without changing the genetic code itself. From these marks they built several epigenetic clocks that estimate biological age. Some clocks, such as GrimAge, are trained to predict not just age but the risk of death and disease. It turned out that in people with a hard childhood, these clocks run fast. In women with the most severe trauma, biological age was on average 2.4 years ahead of chronological age. In men the effect was weaker.

The link between trauma and accelerated aging was partly explained by smoking. When the researchers accounted for smoking levels, measured from the same DNA marks, the clocks' hurry decreased noticeably but did not disappear entirely.

Next, the scientists checked how this accelerated aging relates to chronic pain. It turned out that people with a hard childhood were 3.8 times more likely to suffer from long-lasting pain. And here women again proved more vulnerable. The GrimAge clocks partly explained this link, but once smoking was taken into account, that explanation faded away. So the path from childhood trauma to pain runs largely through behavior, not only through biology.

Why GrimAge in particular? This clock is trained on mortality and morbidity data, so it is sensitive to inflammation, metabolism, and other processes that accompany disease. Horvath and Hannum, trained on chronological age, showed no such link.

The film of time is relentless, but its scratches can be examined and perhaps polished out. If early stress accelerates biological aging and increases vulnerability to pain, then support in childhood and giving up bad habits in adulthood may slow this process down. The study offers no ready-made recipes, but it highlights where to look for levers. For now, one thing is clear: childhood does not pass without a trace, and its traces can be measured in blood.

The GrimAge clock was trained to predict mortality, not age, so its acceleration in people with severe childhood adversity literally means their cells look "older" in terms of the risk of dying earlier.

Take the whole work

Not published on arXiv. Here are its page, the PDF and the formalization: you can check it yourself, not only read our account.

Concepts
chronological age inflammation aging cohort study