لماذا النجوم الأكثر ضخامة ليست الأكبر حجمًا سريع

الملخص الأصلي

كما كتبه المؤلفون، بالإنجليزية arXiv:2607.28013v1

One might expect the most massive stars to also be the largest by size, yet they are not, and this has puzzled astronomers for decades. The Eddington limit sets an upper bound to stellar mass through the balance between radiation pressure and gravity, but a second empirical boundary on stellar radius has equally far-reaching consequences for modern Astrophysics: it affects the black-hole masses and merger rates inferred by LIGO and Virgo, determines whether a star remains a hot, compact ionising source or inflates into a cool supergiant, and thereby shapes how spectra of distant, unresolved stellar populations are interpreted. Half a century ago, this radius limit was shown to trace a characteristic kinked shape in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram known as the Humphreys-Davidson limit, yet a predictive, first-principle physical explanation has remained elusive. Here we show that this kink is the evolutionary manifestation of a transition from classical stellar outflows to an Eddington-enhanced mass-loss regime implemented self consistently in evolutionary models. With our models accurately reproducing the empirical constraints on the radii of the most massive stars, we now have a framework that can be incorporated into binary population synthesis, black-hole mass predictions, gravitational-wave event rates, and the interpretation of high-redshift James Webb spectra.