A fraction of a second after the big bang, the universe was a searing hot soup of particles and antiparticles. By all rights, they should have annihilated each other completely, leaving only emptiness. But for some unknown reason, one "extra" matter particle survived for every billion pairs. It was from these surviving scraps that galaxies, stars, and people eventually formed. To explain this imbalance, physicists look back to an era when the Standard Model (the unification of electric and radioactive forces) behaved differently — when bubbles of a new phase bubbled up within that boiling soup, like bubbles in a pot. Particles passing through the bubble's wall felt a slight preference for matter — like a traffic cop holding the green light a moment longer for cars in one direction.
This process is described by equations akin to transport equations: they track how many particles of each type are where. The most famous tool is the equation proposed by Ludwig Boltzmann back in the 19th century. It accounts for collisions and motion. But in the quantum world, particles also 'jitter' — constantly exchanging energy with their surroundings. The new work refines this equation, deriving it rigorously from quantum field theory — the most precise language for talking about particles. The authors included corrections that were previously discarded. And they made the derivation transparent for systems where different particle species mix. In essence, they built a sturdier bridge between microscopic theory and macroscopic flows in the early universe.
This step may not radically change the picture, but it provides solid ground for future calculations. Until now, models of matter generation have contained simplifications and guesswork. Now, with this field-theoretic approach, the fog is lifting a bit. That opens the door to a better understanding of why our world is made of matter rather than pure energy. And why there is anything at all, not just emptiness.
Boltzmann's equation was originally derived for gases in the 19th century, and today it helps unravel the mysteries of the universe's birth.
In sci-fi sagas like Star Trek, antimatter engines run on annihilation. But if there were as much antimatter as matter, such engines would be unnecessary: everything would annihilate on its own.