The Dance of Two Protostars: How Eccentric Pairs Are Born ✛

Original: "An Eccentric Massive Protobinary Assembled via a Core-merger Parabolic Encounter"
arXiv:2609.07390v1 · 2026-09-07 · CC BY 4.0 · 2 min
Two massive protostars in the IRAS 07299−1651 system follow a nearly parabolic orbit, hinting that they recently came together from independent cores.

In a dense cloud of gas and dust where massive stars are born, two young stars recently passed very close to each other. Their dance has lasted only about sixty years, and astronomers have now seen it in detail for the first time. The IRAS 07299−1651 system lies 1.4 kiloparsecs away, and over eight years of observations its components shifted on the sky by an amount the eye cannot discern, yet instruments recorded it with precision down to one ten-thousandth of an arcsecond.

The pair's orbit turns out to be nearly parabolic, meaning the stars are flying apart after their close encounter but are still bound by mutual gravity. The point of closest approach, periastron, was passed around 1965, when the separation between the stars was about 139 astronomical units. For comparison, Pluto sits on average 39.5 astronomical units from the Sun, so the stars came within about three and a half times that distance.

The disks of both protostars are strongly inclined to the orbital plane: one by 59 degrees, the other by 133 degrees, meaning the second rotates in the opposite sense. Such a configuration does not arise if both stars were born from a single rotating cloud, but it is natural for a chance encounter between two independent wanderers.

Why does this matter? Most massive stars live in pairs, but exactly how such unions form has been a matter of debate. One scenario holds that a single star splits in two during collapse; another says two independent cores approach and capture each other. Observations of IRAS 07299−1651 now show, for the first time, that the second path is possible even for close pairs that may eventually merge or become sources of gravitational waves.

Further monitoring of the system will clarify whether the stars will stay together or fly apart forever. If the orbit turns out to be hyperbolic, that would be direct evidence of capture. If the pair is bound, friction with gas will gradually make the orbit rounder and tighter. Searching for similar systems in other star-forming regions will help us understand how often massive binaries are born through chance encounters rather than a shared childhood.

Periastron was passed only about 60 years ago, meaning that at the time of observation the stars were still moving apart after their closest approach. Had astronomers looked at the system a century ago, they would have seen it in a completely different configuration.

\ddot{\mathbf{r}} + \frac{G M_{\mathrm{tot}}}{r^3} \mathbf{r} = 0
The acceleration of the relative position of two stars is inversely proportional to the square of the distance and directed toward the center of mass, which determines the shape of the orbit.
\tau_{\nu,\mathrm{ff}} = 3.366 \times 10^{-7} \left( \frac{T}{10^4 \, \mathrm{K}} \right)^{-1.323} \left( \frac{\nu}{10^9 \, \mathrm{Hz}} \right)^{-2.118} \left( \frac{\mathrm{EM}}{\mathrm{pc}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-6}} \right)
Shows how opaque the ionized plasma is to radio emission at a given frequency; depends on temperature, frequency, and emission measure.
\cos \psi_{\alpha\beta} = \sin i_\alpha \sin i_\beta \cos(\phi_\alpha - \phi_\beta) + \cos i_\alpha \cos i_\beta
Computes the angle between the planes of two disks or between a disk and the orbit from their inclinations and position angles.
Concepts
binary stellar evolution binary star young star stellar planetary misalignment protoplanetary disk population iii stars eccentric orbit starburst asteroid belt pair instability supernova supermassive black hole formation white dwarf extreme mass ratio inspiral protoplanetary disk dynamics core collapse planetary embryo cataclysmic variable trappist 1 superdense matter ultraluminous x ray source