In a climate trial, the judge doesn't listen to who shouts loudest. He watches who whispers to whom. Nine witnesses, from carbon dioxide to cosmic rays, testified from 1984 to 2005. Their statements were recorded every month. The judge doesn't trust mere coincidences, because two witnesses might echo each other without knowing who started first. He looks for a one-way flow of information.
The records were cleaned of slow trends, leaving fast fluctuations. Then, for each pair of 'suspect and temperature,' they calculated who whispers to whom, with delays from zero to ten months. To filter out random coincidences, the records were shuffled one hundred times to see if the signal persisted. If the whisper disappeared after shuffling, then in the real data it was genuine.
Previously, correlations could not distinguish cause from effect: a warm ocean also releases more CO₂. The judge hears the direction of the whisper. It turned out that volcanic aerosols from the El Chichón eruption in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991 left a clear mark in the records. Nitrous oxide, despite being a potent greenhouse gas that stays in the atmosphere for about 120 years, barely whispered because of its low concentration.
This method requires no model assumptions, so it can serve as an independent check for climate models. The judge doesn't know the physics but sees who controls whom. His verdict does not negate anthropogenic warming; rather, it clarifies that natural variability contributed comparably to short-term temperature fluctuations during those years. Now the judge is ready for new cases: longer records, paleoclimate reconstructions, and other witnesses.
Nitrous oxide (N₂O) has a strong radiative effect per molecule and stays in the atmosphere for about 120 years, yet its contribution turned out to be marginal due to low concentration. Volcanic aerosols from the 1982 El Chichón and 1991 Pinatubo eruptions produced an optical depth spike that the method confidently identified as a temperature driver.
In Kim Stanley Robinson's novel The Ministry for the Future, climatologists try to separate natural fluctuations from the anthropogenic signal to justify geoengineering measures. The entropy transfer method from this paper resembles their tool for identifying causal links in climate data.