The same orchestra sounds different when two different conductors take the podium. One swings the baton wide, and the whole hall feels his accents; the other barely nods, and only certain instruments respond. So it is in the Pacific: the warm phase El Niño and the cold phase La Niña are two conductors of global rainfall, but each has two distinct personalities.
The classic type warms the waters off the coast of South America, while the other, called the central Pacific type, shifts the warm pool to the middle of the ocean. Scientists set out to test how each type relates to very wet and very dry seasons on land. To do this, they took rainfall data spanning 65 years and calculated how often extreme seasons coincided with a given phase of El Niño or La Niña.
It turned out that the classic type produces broad and coherent anomalies: droughts in Indonesia, the Philippines, and the northern Amazon, and wet conditions in western North America. The central Pacific type acts more locally: it brings droughts to the east coast of Australia and wet conditions to southern Chile and Central Asia. For the first time, it has been shown that the central Pacific El Niño is accompanied by increased rainfall in Central Asia, while the central Pacific La Niña is accompanied by a deficit there.
If the type of a developing El Niño can be identified early enough, it would be possible to provide advance warnings of likely droughts or floods in specific regions. This would help farmers plan their plantings and cities prepare for water shortages. Then the two conductors would no longer be a mystery: their gestures could be read in advance, before the first chords.
The term "Modoki" for Central Pacific El Niño comes from a Japanese word meaning "similar but different," which accurately reflects its character: it looks like classic El Niño on the surface but behaves differently.