Advanced

The Universe Doesn't Remember Its Youth: The Echo of Quantum Gravity Can't Be Caught ⚡ экспресс

Original: "Constraints on the Phenomenology of Dissipative Cosmological Memory from BAO (BOSS + DESI 2024) and Pantheon+ Data"
· S. M. Ponomarenko
arXiv:2606.00227 · 2026-05-29 · CC BY · ⏱ 1 min · General Relativity
Scientists tested whether events right after the Big Bang could affect the current expansion of the cosmos. The answer: no.
Abstract

A phenomenological model of 'dissipative memory' in the gravitational field is proposed and tested, where early quantum-gravitational processes leave a relic imprint on the universe's expansion rate. The model is parametrized by an additional fluid with amplitude ε, damping scale z_*, and steepness index β, obeying the Debye law f(z) = exp[-(z/z_*)^β]. A joint Bayesian analysis is conducted using data from baryon acoustic oscillations (BOSS DR12, DESI 2024), photometric distances to supernovae (Pantheon+), and H0 measurements (SHOES and Planck). Global optimization shows the best fit is identical to ΛCDM: the memory correction vanishes over the entire observed range z ∈ [0.3, 2.3] (Δχ² < 0.01 with three extra parameters, ΔAIC = +6.0, ΔBIC = +9.9). An upper limit on the memory amplitude is set: ε < 0.05 for z_* < 2 (95% confidence level). The physical interpretation of this constraint is discussed, and observational channels where the memory effect could potentially appear are pointed out.

Links in the knowledge graph 1

📄 Showing the "Simple" version — "Advanced" is not ready yet. Add it to favorites to help prioritize it.

Immediately after the Big Bang, space may have vibrated like a string from quantum effects. As these oscillations faded, they would have left a mark on the expansion of galaxies—a memory effect. The search for this echo in telescope data turned up nothing.

Scientists modeled this memory as a vanishing energy and compared it with distances to supernovae and the sound waves of the early universe (baryon acoustic oscillations). They found no deviations from the standard picture with dark energy and dark matter. Even a faint signal, contributing more than 5% of the dark energy density, would have been noticeable.

So, either quantum gravity doesn't affect expansion, or its traces are thinner than a spider's web. And while Adam Riess and other scientists are building ultra-precise maps of the cosmos, the quantum past remains silent for now. Paradoxically, this very silence strengthens our trust in the standard model, while future instruments might just catch the whisper of the first moments.

🎯 To directly detect quantum gravity, you'd need an accelerator the size of the Milky Way—that's why scientists look for its indirect traces.

Scientists
Alan GuthAndrei LindeGeorges LemaîtreJames PeeblesAdam RiessBrian Schmidt
Tags
expansion of the universe dark energy dark matter big bang supernova
Laws
Friedmann equationsHubble's lawgravitational lensingEinstein field equationsPlanck's lawvirial theorem
Original: arXiv:2606.00227 · CC BY · bridge42worlds