How Inheritance Division Shapes Survival express

Original: "Shared environmental risk selects asymmetric inheritance of a protective reserve"
· Quentin Thommen
arXiv:2608.13370v1 · 2026-08-13 · CC BY 4.0 · 1 min
Equal inheritance isn't always the best strategy.

Two daughter cells receiving equal shares from the mother: that's the familiar picture of division. But what if one gets almost everything and the other just crumbs? Stochastic modeling shows that sometimes unequal division is more advantageous.

Each cell stores a protective reserve that helps it weather hardships. During division, this reserve is distributed between daughters. If the environment is shared by all cells, weak common influence favors equal division. But when common fluctuations are strong, it's better to give one daughter about eighty percent and the other twenty. The shift to such unequal division happens abruptly, like flipping a switch, not gradually like turning a dial.

Unequal division is not a mistake but a strategy: one cell gets a chance to become strong, while the other remains modest, but together they boost the chances of the entire lineage.

The reason is that the shared environment affects everyone equally, but unequal inheritance reduces sensitivity to collective fluctuations. Even if the protective mechanism or memory of the reserve changes, the unequal branch persists, though its boundaries shift. Thus, a simple division rule explains why asymmetry in inheritance is found in living nature.

Asymmetric cell division is observed in stem cells: one daughter remains a stem cell, while the other becomes specialized.

Scientists
Andrey Markov
Concepts
random forest ecological pyramid rule exponential distribution Shelford's law of tolerance horizontal gene transfer species stochastic gene expression log-normal distribution ecological resilience generative model evolution conservation law covariance matrix redundancy Mendel's Law of Segregation Price equation Mendel's law of independent assortment founder effect Gause's competitive exclusion principle Hamilton's rule