Quantum Key from Energy Teleportation ✛ ✎

Original: "Quantum Key Distribution by Quantum Energy Teleportation"
· Shlomi Dolev, Kazuki Ikeda, Yaron Oz
arXiv:2506.02054v2 · 2025-06-01 · arXiv non-exclusive · independent analysis · 2 min
Quantum key distribution can be built on energy teleportation instead of state measurement.

Energy as a signature: the sign of the transferred pulse reveals the secret. This metaphor is the key to a new quantum key distribution protocol that uses energy teleportation instead of state measurement. In standard schemes such as BB84 or E91, the secret bit is extracted from measurement outcomes, but here it is hidden in whether Bob gains or loses energy after a local operation.

In numerical examples, the teleported energy is only a small fraction (on the order of $10^{-2}$–$10^{-1}$) of the natural energy scale of the Hamiltonian, but a few thousand repeated measurements suffice to distinguish the sign.

The protocol begins with Alice and Bob sharing an entangled ground state of a known Hamiltonian. Alice performs a local projective measurement in a randomly chosen basis, injecting energy into her subsystem, and sends the measurement outcome and basis to Bob over a classical channel. Bob applies a local operation depending on the received bit and measures the sign of his local energy change: a negative value corresponds to logical bit 1, a positive value to bit 0. Security rests on the fact that Eve, intercepting the quantum channel, cannot reproduce the energy statistics without computational power of the postBQP class.

Robustness to noise is impressive: with a classical channel error rate up to a threshold of about 25%, the protocol continues to work, and depolarizing noise reduces the energy by a factor (1-p) but does not change its sign. Admixture of the first excited state leads to a sign change of energy with a probability of about 0.2–0.25, which limits the acceptable noise level. Bit errors on Bob's side significantly affect the energy but can be corrected by quantum error correction; phase errors are less critical for small J. For the multiparty extension, the protocol allows detection of a dishonest participant by comparing the signs of measured energies.

Practical implementation requires systems with a sufficiently large energy gap and teleported energy to reliably distinguish the sign. Promising candidates include quantum optical setups, trapped ions, and superconducting circuits, which can provide the necessary parameters. For scaling the multiparty protocol, it is important to use integrable models such as the Thirring model, where ground-state correlators are computed analytically, simplifying calibration and verification. In quantum cryptography, the open problem of protocol robustness against realistic noise and side-channel attacks remains, and this work connects that problem to the precision of preparing ground states of many-body systems, which is computationally hard for classical computers and limits the scaling of multiparty protocols.

The teleported energy in numerical examples is only a small fraction (on the order of $10^{-2}$–$10^{-1}$) of the natural energy scale of the Hamiltonian, but a few thousand repeated measurements suffice to distinguish the sign.

Scientists
David DeutschErwin SchrödingerJohn Stewart BellLouis de BroglieLov GroverPaul Benioff
Concepts
quantum key distribution quantum teleportation secure communication energy exchange data transmission encryption error propagation information spread data center transition momentum transfer energy distribution work memory cell qubit network heat tunnel effect heat transfer logical qubit