Simple

Why Red Dwarfs Have Fewer Chances for Photosynthesis ⚡ экспресс

Original: "Photosynthetic exergy I. Thermodynamic limits for habitable-zone planets"
· Giovanni Covone, Amedeo Balbi
arXiv:2602.20789 · 2026-02-24 · CC BY 4.0 · ⏱ 1 min · Exoplanets
Scientists have shown that stars similar to the Sun are best suited for photosynthesis on exoplanets.
Abstract

Scientists have figured out how much stellar energy is actually available for photosynthesis on planets. It turns out that around Sun-like stars, the potential for oxygen production is about five times higher than around cold red dwarfs. For such dim stars, light is like watered-down fuel, and plants would have to capture bluer rays. What would life look like under a red sun?

Links in the knowledge graph 1

Oxygenic photosynthesis requires splitting water. It's kind of like a water wheel: to make it spin, you need a strong current. Light acts as the current, and light particles are the streams. For red dwarfs, the most common stars, the light is "cool" and weak — the streams barely move the wheel.

Scientists, applying the concept of entropy (a measure of disorder), calculated the maximum work such a wheel could do. The result: around exoplanets near Sun-like stars, the flow of suitable streams is five times stronger.

But even on Earth, with its bright Sun, the wheel uses only a drop of the available energy. The theoretical maximum oxygen output is thousands of times higher than what's actually produced. So complex life might be hiding unnoticed — and we should search for it around stars similar to ours.

🎯 The upper theoretical limit for oxygen production on Earth is thousands of times higher than what plants actually produce.

Scientists
Christian DopplerD. B. McLaughlinDidier QuelozMichel MayorR. A. RossiterJacob Bekenstein
Tags
exoplanet Sun Water entropy
Laws
second law of thermodynamicsDoppler effectBekenstein-Hawking entropyKepler's third lawStefan–Boltzmann lawBoltzmann distribution
Original: arXiv:2602.20789 · CC BY 4.0 · bridge42worlds