The Schrödinger–Newton model describes quantum particles that attract themselves (self-gravity) and each other. Key result: a particle's own gravity doesn't create quantum entanglement, but mutual gravity does. Computer simulations in one-dimensional space showed that entanglement growth strongly depends on the initial shape of the state and the mass ratio of the particles. If the particles are very spread out and one is much lighter than the other, the lighter particle disintegrates, and entanglement rapidly increases. In contrast, stable self-gravitating states act like a "quantum insulator," almost preventing entanglement.
The riddle of quantum gravity has troubled minds for nearly a century. A classical field that curves spacetime refuses to fit into the probabilistic world of superpositions. Can gravitation, while remaining macroscopic, give rise to microscopic entanglement? New work at the intersection of analytics and numerical simulation offers an unexpected answer. It all depends on which role gravity plays — that of a mirror or a partner.
Imagine a dance duet. Each has a mirror reflecting their own movements: this is self-gravity — a nonlinear potential that makes the wavepacket focus on itself. But there is also a live partner — mutual attraction, a non-separable bond where one's step echoes in the other. So, it's the mirror of self-interaction, as rigorously proven, that does not alter the singular value spectrum of the reduced density matrix, and therefore generates no new quantum correlations. The partner attraction, however, works like a choreographer: it synchronizes movements, weaving a unified quantum pattern out of chaos.
On the one-dimensional 'stage' of the simulation, a full drama unfolded. When the initial wavepackets were blurred and rapidly dispersing (like dancers rushing toward each other through fog), entanglement bloomed richly: the von Neumann entropy — a measure of quantum information — jumped to 0.87. Meanwhile, stationary soliton-like structures, frozen in perfect form, barely trickled to 0.19. Even more striking were the 'Schrödinger cats' — superposition states: here the entropy soared to 1.6–1.7, hinting at the excitation of higher harmonics far beyond the original two-level subspace. And the most dramatic act: when masses differed fourfold, the light particle underwent gravitational shattering — its wavefunction broke into many coherent fragments, sharply enhancing collapse and information capacity. Like a thin string snapping under the weight of a gravitational chord.
The practical and philosophical implications are dazzling. The work sets clear signposts: any semiclassical model that blends a collapse of the Diósi–Penrose type with a Newtonian potential must explicitly specify the nature of mutual attraction — whether it preserves separability or acts as an entangling operator. Next steps include transitioning to two- and three-dimensional geometries, incorporating external noise, and calculating impact parameters. Full-scale 3D modeling will bring us closer to answering the ultimate question: can we catch gravitational entanglement in an Earth-based lab. And beyond that looms a daring conjecture — might spacetime itself be a quantum stage where gravitation weaves the fates of particles into a single lace of existence.
🎯 The Schrödinger–Newton equation was originally proposed as a mechanism for spontaneous wavefunction collapse: it was thought that above a certain mass, a superposition would 'collapse' under its own gravity. Today the same model is used to simulate dark matter halos made of Bose condensate.