The Bullet That Didn't Break the Theory express

Original: "A consistent MOND modelling of the Bullet Cluster"
· X. Hernandez
arXiv:2604.10811 · 2026-04-12 · CC BY 4.0 · 1 min
The Bullet Cluster doesn't refute modified gravity if you look at density, not just mass.

📄 Showing the "Simple" version — "Advanced" is not ready yet. Add it to favorites to help prioritize it.

Two galaxy clusters collided like two swarms of bees flying through each other. One of them is the famous "Bullet." After the collision, the hot gas, which makes up most of the ordinary matter, slowed down and stayed in the center, while the galaxies, like small dense pebbles, flew on. Light from distant objects passing by is bent, as seen in distorted images.

Usually, this is explained as: since the bulk of the mass is in the gas, yet the light bending is stronger near the galaxies, there must be invisible dark matter there. But in the modified gravity theory MOND, attraction depends not only on mass but also on how densely matter is packed. Galaxies are tiny, superdense points compared to gas spread over millions of light-years. So they create strong attraction, even though their total mass is smaller.

Two bags: one with a kilogram of cotton, the other with a kilogram of lead. The mass is the same, but the lead ball will dent the table, while the cotton won't. Same here: dense galaxies "dent" space more than diffuse gas.

The authors calculated what the light bending would be in MOND and compared it with observations. The result matched what general relativity with dark matter predicts. So the Bullet Cluster is not definitive proof of dark matter — both theories work equally well.

Cluster collisions are like a head-on car crash where the bumpers (gas) stay put, but the passengers (galaxies) fly forward. And the fact that the passengers catch the eye more doesn't mean there was invisible cargo in the car.

Original abstract

as written by the authors arXiv:2604.10811

It is a common miss-conception that 1E 0657-56, the "Bullet Cluster", is somehow inconsistent with MOND expectations. The argument centres on the fact that the baryonic matter distribution of this system is dominated by the X-ray emitting gas, while the total projected surface density required under General Relativity to explain the observed lensing signal, centres on the observed galaxies. This is sometimes interpreted as being in conflict with MOND, as under such an interpretation, it is naively assumed that all dark matter being absent, the gravitational potential should necessarily be dominated by the largest mass distribution, that of the gas. However, just as under General Relativity, under MOND, the total gravitational potential of a system depends sensitively upon the volume density and not just on the total mass. It is shown in this {\it letter} that the surface density which QUMOND predicts will be inferred under a standard gravity framework from the total gravitational potential of the Bullet Cluster, closely matches what General Relativity inferences of lensing observations return. The close-to-point-like galaxies imply under QUMOND a relatively much larger surface density signal than what is expected from the Mpc scale gas distribution.

The Bullet Cluster got its name from the shock wave in the gas, which looks like a bullet piercing a cloud.

In the series "Dark Matter," characters travel on a ship that uses invisible mass for navigation, but as this work shows, the invisible isn't always necessary.

Scientists
Fritz ZwickyVera RubinJacob BekensteinKarl SchwarzschildJoseph WeberSubrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Concepts
matter density galaxy cluster mass distribution Gaussian distribution bubble general relativity star formation in clusters standard cosmological model gravitational pull Cosmic Censorship Principle clump modified newtonian dynamics central limit theorem cosmological constant problem galactic circumgalactic medium open cluster structure growth galactic bulge intracluster medium dark matter