Microquasars and Supernova Remnants: Who Paints the Diffuse Sky ✛

Original: "Galactic Microquasar and Supernova Remnants Imprinting on Diffuse Neutrino and Gamma-Ray Sky"
· Shiqi Yu, Bing Theodore Zhang
arXiv:2608.22374v1 · 2026-08-23 · CC BY 4.0 · 4 min
Two populations of accelerators explain the diffuse neutrinos and gamma rays of the Galaxy.

Context

The diffuse neutrino emission of the Galaxy, detected by IceCube at 5.7 sigma, opens a direct window into hadronic interactions of cosmic rays with interstellar gas. Existing diffuse background templates typically assume a single cosmic-ray injection spectrum across all energies and do not account for independent contributions from different accelerator populations. Meanwhile, supernova remnants are unlikely to accelerate particles to PeV energies, while microquasars with relativistic jets are natural candidates for PeV accelerators. This work fits into a series of recent studies linking diffuse neutrinos and gamma rays to specific source classes, but it is the first to separate these classes in a unified numerical scheme.

Methods

The authors model the spatiotemporal distribution of microquasars and supernova remnants in the Galaxy, assigning their positions according to a radial profile and an exponential vertical distribution with a characteristic height of 0.15 kpc. For each source, the cosmic-ray density is calculated using a diffusion propagator with free escape at the halo boundaries of ±4 kpc. The injection spectra of the two populations differ: for supernova remnants, the index is 2.4 for protons and 2.24 for helium, with maximum energies of 68 and 468 TeV; for microquasars, the index is 2.0 with a cutoff at 6 PeV. Acceleration efficiencies are fitted to local measurements from DAMPE and LHAASO above 1 TeV. Secondary neutrinos and gamma rays are computed via hadronic collisions with a three-dimensional gas distribution, including atomic and molecular hydrogen.

Results

Fitting the efficiencies yields values of about 10% for microquasar protons and 6% for supernova remnant protons, with uncertainties at the level of tenths of a percent. The predicted diffuse neutrino spectrum in the inner Galaxy agrees with IceCube templates, with supernova remnants dominating below 10 TeV and microquasars above, naturally explaining the observed spectral hardening. The diffuse gamma-ray flux, calculated with absorption on background radiation, reproduces LHAASO data in the inner and outer Galaxy. Above 100 TeV, the leptonic contribution is suppressed by the Klein–Nishina effect, leaving a pure hadronic background from microquasars. Spatial maps show that hot spots in the neutrino sky correspond not to individual accelerators but to regions of dense gas onto which the sea of cosmic rays is projected.

Implications

This work differs from neighboring studies in that it does not fit a single injection spectrum to the data but physically separates two source populations with different maximum energies and indices. This allows explaining the hardening of the diffuse spectrum above 10 TeV as a natural transition from soft supernova remnants to hard microquasars. The model provides a testable baseline background for point-source searches and links local cosmic-ray measurements to global diffuse emission, despite the stochasticity of nearby sources.

Future development

In the future, the model can be extended by adding anisotropic diffusion, fluctuations in source distribution, and more detailed interstellar gas maps. Accounting for recent active accelerators whose particles have not yet reached the Solar System but are already interacting with surrounding gas will help refine the contribution to diffuse neutrinos. Joint analysis of high-resolution neutrino and gamma-ray maps will help separate leptonic remnants below 100 TeV and characterize hadronic emission up to PeV energies.

Impact

The results will directly impact the search for point-like neutrino sources in the Galactic plane by providing a physically motivated background for IceCube, KM3NeT, and Baikal-GVD. They also provide a template for interpreting LHAASO diffuse gamma-ray data and for testing hypotheses about PeV accelerators.

Next steps

Immediate next steps include incorporating anisotropic cosmic-ray transport and fluctuations in source distribution to obtain self-consistent templates. A systematic assessment of uncertainties from hadronic interaction models and the Galactic magnetic field is also planned.

Key open problems

This work directly addresses the unresolved problem of the origin of cosmic rays up to PeV energies and the contribution of different classes of Galactic accelerators. It also touches on the question of how to separate the diffuse background from point sources in multi-messenger observations, which remains a key challenge in neutrino astronomy.

The knowledge machine's view

This section is addressed to the author of the paper and their colleagues. Neighbouring works were found by meaning-based search across our archive, not by word overlap. We do not review: we show the field around the work.

What the work does

The authors built a numerical model of the diffuse neutrino and gamma-ray emission from the Galaxy, separating the contributions of supernova remnants and microquasars. They calculated the spatial distribution of sources, injection spectra with different maximum energies and spectral indices, and fitted the acceleration efficiencies to the DAMPE and LHAASO data. The resulting neutrino spectrum agrees with IceCube, with supernova remnants dominating below 10 TeV and microquasars above.

Where its strength is

The model physically separates two populations of accelerators with different injection spectra, which naturally explains the observed hardening of the diffuse spectrum above 10 TeV. This provides a testable baseline for future multi-messenger observations.

Where it could go next

Worth trying

  • Test how the predictions for the inner Galaxy change when including an additional contribution from black hole coronae.
  • Estimate what fraction of the diffuse flux could come from unresolved point sources such as red nuggets, using their spectral characteristics.
  • Compare the model maps of the neutrino sky with maps built from the catalog of distant black holes to identify regions with excess.

Why this may matter

Separating the contributions of different accelerator classes to the diffuse background is important for interpreting future data from IceCube-Gen2 and KM3NeT, as well as for searching for new source populations.

The proton acceleration efficiency of about 10% for microquasars means that each such object in its active phase injects energy into cosmic rays comparable to the Eddington luminosity for a black hole of 10 solar masses — approximately $10^{39}$ erg/s.

n_{cr}(E,r,\tau_{lookback}) = L_{cr} \int_{\tau_{min}}^{\tau_{lookback}} P(r,E,\tau)\,d\tau
The particle concentration at point r is built up by diffusion from a source that has been injecting over the injection time.
q_\nu(E_\nu,r) = n_{gas}(r) \int dE_p\, n_p(E_p,r)\,\beta c\,\sigma_{pp}(E_p)\,\frac{dN_\nu}{dE_\nu}(E_\nu,E_p)
The number of neutrinos at point r is proportional to the gas density and the proton flux, multiplied by the cross section and particle yield.
\phi_\nu(E_\nu,\Omega) = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int dE_p\, \beta c\,\sigma_{pp}(E_p)\,\frac{dN_\nu}{dE_\nu}(E_\nu,E_p)\,X(\Omega,E_p)
The observed flux is the sum of contributions from all points along the direction where cosmic rays and gas intersect.

Key numbers

  • proton acceleration efficiency of microquasars: 9.59%
  • proton acceleration efficiency of supernova remnants: 6.00%
  • maximum proton energy from microquasars: 6 PeV
  • maximum proton energy from supernova remnants: 68 TeV
  • threshold for microquasar dominance: 10 TeV
Scientists
Paul DiracBernhard RiemannJoseph WeberKarl SchwarzschildKip ThorneRainer Weiss
Concepts
cosmic neutrino relic neutrino supernova remnant cosmic accelerator neutron star in supernova remnant icecube interstellar gas neutron star bubble galactic dust winds galactic outflow crab nebula large magellanic cloud gamma ray telescope stellar chemical abundances nicer gas cloud lhaaso population iii stars pulsar wind nebula