Quantum Corrections to Van der Waals Black Holes: Universality and Topology ✛

Original: "Van der Waals Black Holes: Universality, Quantum Corrections, and Topological Classifications"
· Ankit Anand, Saeed Noori Gashti
arXiv:2507.21663 · 2025-07-29 · CC BY 4.0 · 5 min
Even after quantum corrections, black holes resembling a Van der Waals gas retain a universal relation between entropy and extremality, while their topological classes depend on the chosen model.

Context

Black hole thermodynamics in anti-de Sitter space is experiencing a renaissance thanks to the holographic correspondence. Here, black holes are not isolated objects but thermal states of a dual quantum field theory. It has long been noted that their equation of state mirrors the Van der Waals equation: there is an analog of liquid and gas phases, a critical point, and even latent heat of transition. However, the classical picture relies on Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, proportional to the horizon area. Quantum gravity predicts deviations from this simple formula: a minimal length, deformation of uncertainty relations, and dependence of geometry on particle energy. The question is how fragile these beautiful analogies are under such corrections. The work follows recent studies where topological invariants, winding numbers of a vector field on the parameter space, have been used to classify phase transitions in black holes. Neighboring papers on the archive discussed black hole evaporation, quantum granularity of space, and hidden light states, but no one had combined all three types of corrections with a test of the universal extremality relation and topology in a single model.

Methods

The authors took a static spherically symmetric metric that reproduces the Van der Waals equation of state and successively introduced three types of quantum corrections. For the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP), they modified the uncertainty relation by adding a momentum-squared term with parameter α. For the extended uncertainty principle (EUP), they added a coordinate-dependent term with parameter β. For rainbow gravity, they introduced two energy-dependent functions that deform the temporal and spatial components of the metric. In each case, they computed the corrected entropy, temperature, and mass, then tested the universal extremality relation, which connects the derivative of the extremal mass with respect to the correction parameter to the limit of the product of temperature and the derivative of entropy. Topology was investigated via the generalized free energy, constructing a vector field from its gradient and computing winding numbers around zeros of this field on the plane of horizon radius versus angular coordinate. For the photon sphere, they used an effective potential and sought roots of the derivative of a regular function H(r,θ).

Results

In the classical case, entropy is the horizon area, and the standard universal relation holds with a proportionality coefficient of 1. After GUP correction, entropy acquires a negative logarithmic addition, and the direct relation is violated. However, if one accounts for the derivative of area with respect to the new entropy, the generalized relation holds exactly. The same for EUP: entropy grows slower than area, and the generalized relation again works. In rainbow gravity, entropy receives a positive logarithmic correction, and the generalized relation is also confirmed. The topological classification turned out to be different. For the classical Van der Waals black hole with small parameter b, there are two topological charges (+1 and −1), with total charge zero; as b increases, only one charge +1 remains. GUP corrections make the classification stable: for any parameters, two charges (+1, −1) and total zero. EUP gives two different classes: for some parameters, three charges (−1, +1, −1) with sum −1; for others, two or four charges with sum zero. Rainbow gravity again gives a stable two charges (+1, −1) and total zero. The photon sphere for the classical model always has topological charge −1, while for quantum-corrected models the roots of the vector field lie below the horizon and are invisible to an external observer.

Implications

The work shows that the universal extremality relation is not an accidental property of a specific entropy formula but a structural feature of black hole thermodynamics that survives quantum deformations. This strengthens confidence in generalized relations as a tool for testing quantum gravity theories. Topological classification, in contrast, is sensitive to the type of correction: GUP and rainbow gravity preserve one class, while EUP splits it into two. Thus, topological invariants can serve as a filter to distinguish quantum gravity models by their thermodynamic signatures. Compared to neighboring works that studied evaporation or granularity separately, here for the first time three competing corrections are assembled in one model and tested with the same method. This is not just another black hole but a testing ground for comparing predictions.

Future development

The topic could develop toward more realistic rotating and charged black holes, where topology is richer. It would be interesting to check whether the EUP class splitting persists at higher orders in parameter β. Another direction is to connect topological charges with observable quantities: black hole shadow, quasinormal modes, gravitational waves. If different classes yield different signatures, topology becomes not an abstract classification but a working tool for astrophysics.

Impact

The results will affect quantum gravity theories, where models need to be selected by thermodynamic signatures, and holography, where black holes serve as thermal states. They also provide a new language for describing phase transitions in strongly interacting systems.

Next steps

Test the generalized universal relation for rotating and charged black holes with the same three corrections. Build a topological classification at nonzero chemical potential and see how winding numbers change.

Key open problems

For black hole physics, the final stage of evaporation remains an open question: does a remnant survive, and what is its entropy? The work shows that quantum corrections alter entropy differently: GUP suppresses growth, rainbow gravity enhances it. This directly affects information paradox scenarios. Another unresolved problem is the microscopic origin of Bekenstein–Hawking entropy; topological charges may be related to the number of microstates.

The knowledge machine's view

This section is addressed to the author of the paper and their colleagues. Neighbouring works were found by meaning-based search across our archive, not by word overlap. We do not review: we show the field around the work.

What the work does

The authors considered a static spherically symmetric black hole with a van der Waals equation of state and introduced three types of quantum corrections: the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP), the extended uncertainty principle (EUP), and rainbow gravity. For each case, they computed the corrected thermodynamic quantities and checked the universal extremality relation, which turned out to be robust. They performed a topological classification using winding numbers of the vector field of the generalized free energy and found that GUP and rainbow gravity yield one stable class, while EUP yields two distinct classes.

Where its strength is

The work brings together several active research directions: quantum corrections to black hole thermodynamics, universal relations, and topological methods. This combination allows one to test the generality of results obtained in different approaches and provides a tool for classifying quantum effects.

Where it could go next

  • It might be interesting to compare the obtained topological classification with the behavior of black holes during evaporation, where phase transitions and topology changes also occur. In our archive there is an analysis where a black hole is treated as a boiling liquid with bubble dynamics; one could look for analogies with the classes given by EUP.based on: Black holes behave like boiling water arXiv:2512.19200
  • Nearby lies a work on a black hole as a 'cosmic pressure cooker', which analyzes hidden thermal states. Perhaps your methods with the vector field and winding numbers could help reveal additional topological structures in such models.based on: Black Hole as a Cosmic Cooking Pot: New Theory Reveals Its 'Kitchen' Secrets arXiv:2511.18407
  • It would be interesting to check whether the universal extremality relation holds for black holes with a quark sector, where thermodynamics is complicated by additional degrees of freedom. This could show how sensitive universality is to the microscopic structure.based on: Black Hole with a Quark Secret arXiv:2607.04173

Worth trying

  • Apply topological analysis to a black hole model that cools to zero temperature and see whether new winding classes emerge.
  • Use an effective potential approach for the photon sphere in singularity-free models and check how winding numbers change when the horizon is smoothed.
  • Investigate how universal relations behave in black holes born from vacuum, where thermodynamic parameters may be non-monotonic.

Why this may matter

Combining topological methods with quantum corrections may offer a new way to classify microscopic states of black holes and indicate which deformations of the uncertainty principle are compatible with stable thermodynamics. This could help in the search for observational signatures of quantum gravity.

A Van der Waals black hole has a critical point like water: below critical pressure there are two phases, small and large black holes, and at critical pressure they merge. The parameter b in the Van der Waals equation, which for an ordinary gas accounts for finite molecular size, here governs a topological transition: for b < 0.5 there are two charges, for b > 0.5 there is one.

In Greg Egan's novel 'Schild's Ladder', the physics of different universes depends on vacuum states, and transitions between them resemble phase transitions. Here, black holes with different quantum corrections are like different vacua, and the topological charge is like an invariant that does not change under small perturbations.

\frac{\partial M_{\text{ext}}}{\partial \epsilon} = \lim_{M \to M_{\text{ext}}} \left( -T \frac{\partial S}{\partial \epsilon} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial S_{\text{BH}}}{\partial S}
The derivative of the extremal mass with respect to the correction parameter equals the limit of the product of temperature and the derivative of entropy, multiplied by a correction factor: the derivative of horizon area with respect to modified entropy.
S = \pi r_h^2 - \frac{\alpha \pi}{4} \ln\left(\frac{4r_h^2 + \alpha}{\alpha}\right)
Entropy receives a negative logarithmic correction that reduces it compared to the horizon area.
S = \frac{\pi}{\beta} \ln(1 + \beta r_h^2)
Entropy grows slower than horizon area; for small β it reduces to the usual formula.

Key numbers

  • critical parameter b for topological transition: 0.5
  • number of topological classes in EUP model: 2
  • total topological charge in GUP and rainbow models: 0
  • order of quantum corrections: first in α, β, γ
  • number of types of quantum corrections: 3
Scientists
Jacob BekensteinStephen HawkingJohn Archibald WheelerFritz ZwickyKarl SchwarzschildSubrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Concepts
wald entropy black hole thermodynamics hawking area law logarithmic correction quantum corrections topological protection modified gravity singularities extremal black hole schwarzschild metric topological charge general relativity tidal charge Bekenstein-Hawking entropy Hawking area theorem classical gravity topology Wien's displacement law generalized uncertainty principle homotopy event horizon stability