Field electron emission is one of seven historical paradigmatic examples of quantum tunneling, predicted as early as 1928. Today, these effects underpin technologies ranging from atom-probe tomography to lightning protection of spacecraft. However, as the author's half-century experience shows, fundamental gaps remain in the theory, related to the interpretation of the wave function and accounting for many-body interactions. Even Schrödinger initially considered the wave function a description of a real matter distribution but was forced to abandon this view under critical pressure.
The author critically analyzed two main approaches to calculating the tunneling emission rate: the tunneling integral method (originally developed for the Schottky–Nordheim barrier, see formula) and the overlap integral method, dating back to Oppenheimer's work. Comparison was based on experimental data from field ion microscopy—images of tungsten facets and carbon nanotubes. To improve accuracy, a recently introduced special mathematical function vFD(x) and a formulation through amount of substance within the International System of Quantities (ISQ) were used, eliminating conceptual errors associated with the point-electron representation.
It is shown that the tunneling integral approach qualitatively explains the contrast observed in a field ion microscope: atoms at the corners of a crystal facet glow brighter due to local field enhancement and displacement of the critical surface. Meanwhile, the overlap integral method cannot even predict the correct direction of contrast change. Both approaches remain incomplete: neither includes a proper account of the final-state density in both contacting media. A fundamental paradox is also identified: why the front of an electron emerging from a barrier does not detach from its 'tail' under a strong electrostatic field.
An alternative view of the wave function interpretation is proposed: its squared modulus, multiplied by the fundamental atomic amount of substance (1 electron), gives the concentration of 'electron matter' in space. This resolves the negative kinetic energy paradox and questions the standard formulation of the uncertainty principle as a limitation on simultaneous measurement of position and momentum. Instead, the author proposes a principle linking the electron's minimum kinetic energy to the length of its localization region.
In the coming years, a key task will be the direct experimental verification of the image formation mechanism in a field electron microscope. Advances in ultrafast laser technology give hope for 'filming' the tunneling process. Most intriguing is the possibility of extending the refined theory to biological systems: for example, proton tunneling in DNA could be responsible for mutations, and the behavior of helium ions—for radiation damage. This would open the way to quantum biology and even quantum botany.
Revising the foundations of tunneling theory will affect not only surface physics and nanoelectronics but also models of electrical breakdown, medical X-ray sources, and electric propulsion systems for spacecraft.
Immediate steps: experimental verification of the irreversibility of tunneling path choice in many-electron systems; development of a universal formalism combining the tunneling integral and overlap integral, taking into account the real band structure; quantum-mechanical modeling of emission from carbon nanotubes for direct comparison with bond images.
The discussed difficulties are directly related to unresolved problems of quantum mechanics: the measurement problem, wave function interpretation, and the emergence of quantum decoherence. The author's proposal to abandon the point electron echoes the ideas of David Bohm and John Bell, but does not require hidden variables. The statistical irreversibility of tunneling path choice provides a simple mechanism for the arrow of time—an alternative to traditional explanations via decoherence.
This section is addressed to the author of the paper and their colleagues. Neighbouring works were found by meaning-based search across our archive, not by word overlap. We do not review: we show the field around the work.
What the work does
This study presents a critical analysis of two methods for calculating tunneling emission—the tunneling integral and the overlap integral—based on experimental data from field ion microscopy. It is shown that the tunneling integral approach qualitatively explains the observed contrast, whereas the overlap integral method fails to predict even its direction. An interpretation of the squared modulus of the wave function as the concentration of 'electron matter' is proposed, which calls into question the standard uncertainty principle and resolves the paradox of negative kinetic energy.
Where its strength is
The strength of this work lies in combining half a century of experimental experience with a consistent reexamination of foundational concepts: the rejection of the point-like electron and the reformulation of the uncertainty principle are grounded in specific observable effects in field ion microscopy, not in abstract arguments.
Where it could go next
Worth trying
Why this may matter
If the revision of the concept of 'electron position' proves productive, it could impact not only the theory of field emission but also the interpretation of measurements in any systems with strong fields, including astrophysical ones.
Nearby works in our archive
The closest work in the archive sits at 0.64 by meaning — the usual level for our corpus.
The image of chemical bonds in a five-membered carbon ring (Fig. 1) was obtained at room temperature with a magnification of about 100,000,000 times. That's like examining a cherry the size of Earth and seeing its pit! And the brightest atom in the ion image of tungsten (Fig. 3)—the corner one — shines brighter because a larger positive charge accumulated on it due to geometry, and the local field pulls electrons from the gas more efficiently.
The idea that an electron, tunneling through a barrier, behaves like an octopus squeezing through a crack, evokes the scene from Arthur C. Clarke's '2001: A Space Odyssey,' where astronaut Bowman passes through the stargate, undergoing an incomprehensible transformation. The concept of a distributed 'material entity' resonates with the image of the sentient ocean in Stanisław Lem's 'Solaris'—an ocean simultaneously present in many points of space.