
Monogamy of entanglement is a quantum principle limiting how entanglement can be shared among multiple particles.Three coins that always come up heads or tails identically: if the first and second always match, then the third cannot match the first with the same perfection simultaneously. In 2000, William Wootters and colleagues proved an exact inequality for three qubits—the quantum counterparts of coins. The square of the entanglement measure (concurrence) between the first and second plus the square between the first and third cannot exceed the square of the total entanglement of the first with the pair of the second and third. Entanglement, like gold, is limited: if one has already devoted all attention to one partner, only a superficial bond remains with the second. This monogamy distinguishes quantum correlations from classical ones, where one can be friends with everyone equally. Record-breaking experiments in 2017 with the Chinese satellite Micius transmitted a key between Beijing and Vienna, and any attempt at interception immediately reduced the correlations.
The idea that quantum correlations cannot be trivially distributed had been in the air since the appearance of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. In 1996, the group of Bennett, DiVincenzo, and Wootters discussed the inextensibility of a maximally entangled state in the context of quantum computing. A rigorous quantitative formulation appeared in 2000: Valentino Coffman, Jane Kundu, and William Wootters derived the inequality for three qubits, and generalizations followed in 2004. Today, the theorem is a cornerstone of quantum information theory alongside the no-cloning theorem.
The monogamy of entanglement underlies quantum key distribution protocols such as BB84. An eavesdropper, by measuring part of the transmission, reduces the entanglement of legitimate users, which manifests as an increase in errors. In quantum computing, monogamy constraints determine the complexity of creating multipartite entanglement. Scope of applicability: the inequality strictly holds only for pure states; in mixed states, violations are possible, requiring other entanglement measures.
Quantum cryptography relies on monogamy: if a spy tries to intercept the key, the entanglement between legitimate users drops, and the breach becomes noticeable. The stronger the connection between Alice and Bob, the worse for Eve.
The monogamy of entanglement forbids creating a 'quantum internet Trojan': a spy cannot quietly copy a message without spoiling the original. This is a direct consequence of a strong pair excluding the third wheel.
| X_1 | variable | quadrature operator of mode 1 — quadrature operator |
| X_2 | variable | quadrature operator of mode 2 — quadrature operator |
| P_1 | variable | momentum quadrature of mode 1 — quadrature operator |
| P_2 | variable | momentum quadrature of mode 2 — quadrature operator |
| δ | operator | difference between the operator and its expectation value — deviation operator |
| ⟨ ⟩ | operator | quantum mechanical average over the state — expectation value |
| S_A | variable | Entanglement entropy of boundary region A — entanglement entropy |
| Area(minimal surface | variable | Area of the minimal surface in the bulk homologous to A — area square metre |
| G_N | constant | Newton's gravitational constant in the bulk — gravitational constant = 6.67430e-11 cubic metre per kilogram per second squared |















