hubble constant

In the heart of an old city stands a clock tower whose hands have never been adjusted since it was built. By how far it runs slow, you can calculate how much time has stretched since then. In space, the role of such towers is played by relic galaxies — dense stellar systems that formed in the first few billion years and have since neither merged with neighbors nor given birth to new stars.

Stare long enough into the night sky, and sooner or later your gaze hits a blackness beyond which nothing is visible. This is not just a distant fence: it is the edge of the universe accessible to us, the cosmic horizon. Light from more distant stars simply hasn't had time to reach us.

The universe cooled like a giant bathtub after a hot start. At 400 000 years after the Big Bang, hydrogen was ready to recombine — protons capturing electrons to become neutral atoms. But somewhere in this dark water, a tap kept dripping.

Predicted by Albert Einstein, gravitational waves are like beacons in the dark ocean of space. They flare up when black holes collide, sending ripples through the fabric of the Universe.

When the cooling cosmos, in the aftermath of the Big Bang, lost its primordial symmetry, tensions arose in the fields, like microcracks forming in solidifying glass. Global monopoles, predicted by Gerard 't Hooft and Polyakov, became such “scars” on the fabric of the universe. Each monopole is a tiny but incredibly massive knot of field.

Imagine a cosmic orchestra performing a symphony from the Big Bang to the present day. The conductor, dark energy, long seemed an impassive metronome: the cosmological constant Λ motionless, like a baton frozen in mid-air.

Strike a tuning fork. The frequency is 440 Hz. That's the note A — the standard of sound. In the world of numbers, there's a standard too. It's tuned not to sound, but to prime numbers. Though their distribution seems random, it obeys strict laws. All primes resonate together. There's just one value: λ∞ ≈ 0,674036.

The cosmological orchestra doesn't tune to a single tuning fork. There are two groups of instruments: one listens to the hum of the young universe — the cosmic microwave background, while the other reads notes from mature galaxies and supernovae.

Einstein’s cosmological constant — a blunder or a boomerang insight? The universe’s acceleration caught physicists off guard: ΛCDM works, but why is the vacuum energy so absurdly tiny? Imagine an ocean heaving with quantum fluctuations, yet on the surface only a microscopic ripple.

A giant baby planet is still pulling in leftover building material from its surrounding cloud. That's the scene the Hubble Space Telescope captured when it aimed its cameras at an object catalogued as SR 12 c. This companion planet orbits a young star at a wide distance — farther out than Neptune is from the Sun.

The Universe resembles a dense forest: up close, individual galaxy-trees are visible, gathered into groves, but from a distance everything merges into a solid green canopy. The boundary beyond which the cosmos becomes homogeneous is called the angular scale of homogeneity: it's the size of a patch of sky from which galaxies are distributed evenly.

Cosmology is experiencing a tectonic rift. Cepheid-calibrated supernovae, measured by Adam Riess’s team, point to a rate of about 73 km/s per megaparsec.

If you turn on a lamp in a room, it illuminates the walls. But if you place the same lamp in a vast hall, the light barely reaches the corners. Similarly, radiation from young stars affects gas in a galaxy: it knocks electrons out of hydrogen atoms, making the gas glow.

Imagine a giant inflatable balloon with galaxies painted on it. As it inflates, the pattern stretches and neighboring dots move apart. The rate of that stretching is the Hubble constant. Astronomers usually catch light from distant stars and see how much it has reddened due to the stretching of space.

On the kitchen counter, there's a flour scale and a measuring cup for water. Individually, they're precise, but when you bake bread, the recipe calls for the perfect ratio. Astronomers have a similar dispute about the universe's expansion rate.

A hot coffee on the table cools down: heat spreads from the hot center to the edges. The authors suggest that the universe behaves in a similar way, just on scales of billions of light-years. Their model describes not the usual dark energy, but a smooth redistribution of energy within the cosmos, akin to the slow flow of heat from denser regions to rarefied ones.

In the 1920s, Edwin Hubble noticed galaxies were moving apart — thus discovering the expansion of the Universe.

The universe abhors monotony. A century ago, Edwin Hubble and Georges Lemaître gave us an elegant picture: an expanding cosmos, smooth as the surface of an inflated balloon.

The universe keeps a tally of every newborn star. Over 13.8 billion years, galaxies have ignited so many stars that their 'census' can reveal the nature of the cosmos itself, just as tree rings reveal past climates.

Imagine inflating a balloon. At first, it expands slowly; then someone gives a sharp blast of air, and it swells faster. But as the airflow weakens, the balloon's growth slows again. According to a new study, the Universe has behaved much the same way: after the Big Bang, it expanded, then suddenly accelerated, and now that acceleration is fading.

Take two heavy balls and place them a meter apart: they attract each other with a force that weakens by a factor of four when you double the distance. Newton discovered this law, and it works in a room, in the solar system, in a galaxy. But does it still hold when we're talking about hundreds of millions of light-years? Astronomers found a way to test this directly.

Cosmologists have measured how fast distant galaxies are receding in different parts of the sky. To do this, they used two kinds of "cosmic rulers": galaxy clusters and a certain type of supernova explosion. Both methods showed the same thing: in one direction, the Universe is expanding slightly faster than in the opposite direction.

The Universe is expanding, but at what speed? Astronomers have been arguing for decades about the precise value of the Hubble constant. Two classic methods give slightly different results. Now there's a third — using mysterious radio bursts.

If space is a canvas, then brushstrokes cannot be infinitely thin. There's a tiniest segment, shorter than which there's no point in measuring. This quantum 'graininess' alters the geometry itself: the motion of galaxies and the growth of large-scale structures bear its mark.

Two astronomers look at the same universe but see it differently. One measures the expansion rate using ancient light that has been traveling toward us for nearly 14 billion years. The other uses recent stellar explosions in nearby galaxies. The first gets 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec, the second gets 73.

When a heavy nucleus slams into interstellar gas at enormous speed, it shatters into pieces. Those pieces (lithium, beryllium, boron) then fly onward, and their abundance in the cosmic-ray flux depends on how the breakup unfolded. Conventionally, one expected the proportions to shift smoothly with energy, like the taste of soup when you keep adding water.

The universe is expanding, and galaxies are flying apart like raisins in rising dough. The rate of this expansion, the Hubble constant, is a key number in cosmology.

The Higgs boson lives an unimaginably short life — less than a billionth of a second. It cannot be caught directly, so physicists look at what remains after its decay: jets of particles, muons, neutrinos. But some information is lost if you consider only the explicit decay traces rather than the whole event.

The birth of the Universe is usually associated with the Big Bang — a point of infinite density. But at that point, the laws of physics break down, which bothers scientists. Stephen Hawking and James Hartle back in the 1980s proposed a different view: time has no boundary, like the surface of a globe.

The visible edge of the universe is a holographic screen that, like a black hole, obeys laws discovered by Bekenstein and Hawking. Normally, information is preserved on it, but calculations show that if a few bits are lost, energy is released that accelerates expansion.

Scientists proposed a model in which the mysterious force (dark energy) possesses something like inertia: it needs time to respond, like a heavy pendulum. Because of this, the expansion of the Universe doesn’t accelerate forever, but instead decays, like a pendulum in thick honey.

The universe is expanding, and the rate of that expansion is a hot topic in cosmology. Nearly a century ago, Edwin Hubble discovered that galaxies are flying apart, but modern measurements of the Hubble constant, which characterizes the expansion rate, give conflicting values.

Measuring the universe’s expansion is like timing a race when the track stretches. Neutron star mergers act as standard sirens: their gravitational waves ring out with a known “volume,” so fainter signals mean greater distance.

Galaxies in the Universe are not scattered randomly: neighboring ones move in the same direction, like a school of fish, while distant ones each go their own way. Where the boundary between 'together' and 'apart' lies has been unclear until now.

The Universe is expanding, and it's doing so faster and faster. This acceleration is driven by mysterious dark energy. For a long time, it was thought to be as constant as a textbook constant. But new data from DESI, an instrument that captures spectra of millions of galaxies, hint that dark energy may have been stronger or weaker in different epochs.

Modern telescopes see distant galaxies flying apart faster and faster. The cause is called dark energy, but its nature has been a mystery. On top of that, calculations of the expansion rate in the early and late Universe don't match. The answer might lie in an event much like a falling pencil.

The Universe is expanding, and every galaxy cluster takes part in a grand dance. The tempo of this dance is set by the Hubble constant, first measured by Edwin Hubble nearly a century ago. Pinpointing the number is tough because you need a ruler that spans billions of light-years.

Two methods of measuring the Universe's expansion rate yield conflicting results. Measurements from supernova explosions, carried out by Adam Riess's team, show faster expansion than data from the cosmic microwave background — the light left over from the Big Bang.

Type Ia supernovae are the 'standard candles' of cosmology: their peak luminosity is nearly identical, allowing distances to be determined from apparent brightness — the fainter the object, the farther away it is.